Is Los Angeles Ready For its First Mega-Museum? Is Los Angeles Ready For its First Mega-Museum?
- Most Read
Holocaust Survivor’s Remarkable Story Ends In the Most Beautifully Surprising Wayby Craig Carilli
Understand Consent With the Help of Stick Figures and a Cup of Teaby Craig Carilli
Who Likes Heavy Metal? Sharks, That’s Whoby Laura Feinstein
Congress Quietly Barred a Government Agency From Studying Gun Violence Three Months Agoby Aarian Marshall
Baseball Game “Selfie” Sorority Sisters Put Their Newfound Fame to Good Useby Rafi Schwartz
We Need to Stop Saying "Babies Ruin Bodies"by Ntima Preusser
The Great Surrenderby Amanda Fortini
The President Asked Us to Compare Deaths From Terrorism and Gun Violence. Here Are the Numbersby Rafi Schwartz
MIT’s Super-Fast Camera Can Capture Light as it Travelsby Tod Perry
Is Los Angeles Ready For its First Mega-Museum?
A merger is afoot in Los Angeles, but it’s not a movie studio or a record label this time around. This merger involves the city’s two biggest museums, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) and the Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA). LACMA, an encyclopedic museum with a massive campus, stellar educational program, and a magnificent collection of historical art has offered to buy the embattled MOCA, with its youthful audience and top-notch collection of contemporary art, for a reported $100 million.
In terms of quality, I, for one, have enjoyed the dialogue MOCA has begun about the currency of art in Los Angeles in terms of how it deals with popular culture, celebrity, and excess (shows by actor/artists Dennis Hopper and James Franco, and a massively popular exhibition on “street art”)—even if the execution of these exhibitions has been something of a crapshoot. Symbolically, the loss of MOCA’s independent identity would severely impact Los Angeles’ current standing as a nurturing community for art, at least temporarily branding it as a place where a major institutional art center can flail and ultimately fail.
Images courtesy of LACMA and MOCA